Retrospective study in two French teaching hospitals | BMC Emergency Medicine
Sepsis management in the Emergency Department remains a daily challenge. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) has released three-hour bundle. The implementation of these bundles in European Emergency Departments remains poorly described.
The main objective was to assess the compliance with the Severe Sepsis Campaign 3-h bundle (blood culture, lactate dosage, first dose of antibiotics and 30 ml/kg fluid challenge). Secondary objectives were the analysis of the delay of severe sepsis recognition and description of the population.
Full reference: , P. et al. (2017) Recognition and treatment of severe sepsis in the emergency department: retrospective study in two French teaching hospitals. BMC Emergency Medicine. Published online: 30 August 2017
This project explored the feasibility and acceptability of a brief smoking-cessation intervention as part of emergency nursing practice | Journal of Emergency Nursing
Smoking is the single most avoidable risk factor for many health problems such as cardiovascular disease and pulmonary dysfunction. Emergency departments provide care for many patients who smoke. Patients who smoke and are discharged to home from emergency departments do not customarily receive smoking-cessation information.
Emergency nurses felt comfortable performing the smoking-cessation intervention, suggesting that training was effective. Data indicated that patients were consistently advised to quit smoking. Results suggest that brief smoking-cessation interventions are feasible and acceptable in emergency settings. The training and protocol could be used in other emergency departments, and lessons learned can guide future efforts by emergency nurses to help patients quit smoking.
Full reference: Simerson, D. & Hackbarth, D. (2017) Emergency Nurse Implementation of the Brief Smoking-Cessation Intervention: Ask, Advise, and Refer. Journal of Emergency Nursing. Published online: 29 August 2017
Interventions designed to help Emergency Department (ED) staff manage frequent attenders are labour-intensive and only benefit a small sample of frequent attenders | Emergency Medicine Journal
We aimed to use the in-depth knowledge of health professionals with experience of working with ED frequent attenders to understand the challenges of managing this group of patients and their opinions on providing more appropriate support.
Twelve health professionals were interviewed. Three groups of frequent attenders were identified: people with long-term physical conditions, mental health problems and health-related anxiety. Underlying reasons for attendance differed between the groups, highlighting the need for targeted interventions. Suggested interventions included improving self-management of long-term physical conditions; creating a ‘go-to’ place away from the ED for patients experiencing a mental health crisis; increasing the provision of mental health liaison services; and for patients with health-related anxiety, the role of the GP in the patients’ care pathway was emphasised, as were the benefits of providing additional training for ED staff to help identify and support this group.
Full reference: Ablard, S. et al. (2017) Can more appropriate support and services be provided for people who attend the emergency department frequently? National Health Service staff views. Emergency Medicine Journal. Published Online First: 31 August 2017
The number of emergency admissions to hospital in England and Wales has risen sharply in recent years and is a matter of concern to clinicians, policy makers and patients alike. However, the factors that influence this decision are poorly understood | BMJ Open
Findings: Departmental factors such as busyness, time of day and levels of senior support were identified as non-clinical influences on a decision to admit rather than discharge patients. The 4-hour waiting time target, while overall seen as positive, was described as influencing decisions around patient admission, independent of clinical need. Factors external to the hospital such as a patient’s social support and community follow-up were universally considered powerful influences on admission. Lastly, the culture within the ED was described as having a strong influence (either negatively or positively) on the decision to admit patients.
Conclusion: Multiple factors were identified which go some way to explaining marked variation in admission rates observed between different EDs. Many of these factors require further inquiry through quantitative research in order to understand their influence further.
Full reference: Pope, I. et al. (2017) A qualitative study exploring the factors influencing admission to hospital from the emergency department. BMJ Open. 7:e011543.
Despite wide variation in the amount we spend on care, patients’ outcomes are often the same. So clearly, we should just do less. Indeed, given the growing problems of overdiagnosis and overtreatment, less is more | Emergency Medicine Journal
As emergency physicians, we deliver a fair amount of high-intensity care. Yes, good care can sometimes be as simple as an astute diagnosis or a kind word. But it can also involve cross-sectional imaging, invasive procedures and hospital admission. At the right time and for the right patient, we believe, this care can be the difference between life and death.
And yet this care is coming under increasing scrutiny from payers and policy makers.
While emergency care accounts for a small fraction of direct health system costs, the decision to admit a patient to the hospital is an expensive one indeed. There are many good reasons to send patients home—reducing crowding, avoiding hospital-acquired infections and more. But the driving force behind efforts to reduce admissions today is simple: to reduce costs. As a result, physicians everywhere face increasing pressure to discharge patients to home.
This poses a particular dilemma for emergency physicians. On one hand, the rest of the world seems very certain we should be sending more patients home. On the other, our experience suggests that failures of risk stratification and mistriage to home can have terrible consequences.
Full reference: Obermeyer, Z. (2017) Is less more, or is it less? The growing evidence on high-intensity hospital care. Emergency Medicine Journal. Published Online First: 18 August 2017.
Emergency department care – best practice guideline
The Royal College of Emergency Medicine has published a Best Practice Guideline Emergency department care. Developed to help medical staff within Emergency Departments provide better care for patients, this publication is a fifty-point checklist that covers all aspects of emergency care including the patient environment and pathway; education about care; care of elderly patients, children and those with complex needs; team working and leadership.
Harron K, Gilbert R, Cromwell D, et al. International comparison of emergency hospital use for infants: data linkage cohort study in Canada and England
BMJ Qual Saf Published Online First: 12 June 2017. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006253
Objectives To compare emergency hospital use for infants in Ontario (Canada) and England.
Methods We conducted a population-based data linkage study in infants born ≥34 weeks’ gestation between 2010 and 2013 in Ontario (n=253 930) and England (n=1 361 128). Outcomes within 12 months of postnatal discharge were captured in hospital records. The primary outcome was all-cause unplanned admissions. Secondary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, any unplanned hospital contact (either ED or admission) and mortality. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate risk factors for infant admission.
Results The percentage of infants with ≥1 unplanned admission was substantially lower in Ontario (7.9% vs 19.6% in England) while the percentage attending ED but not admitted was higher (39.8% vs 29.9% in England). The percentage of infants with any unplanned hospital contact was similar between countries (42.9% in Ontario, 41.6% in England) as was mortality (0.05% in Ontario, 0.06% in England). Infants attending ED were less likely to be admitted in Ontario (7.3% vs 26.2%), but those who were admitted were more likely to stay for ≥1 night (94.0% vs 55.2%). The strongest risk factors for admission were completed weeks of gestation (adjusted OR for 34–36 weeks vs 39+ weeks: 2.44; 95% CI 2.29 to 2.61 in Ontario and 1.66; 95% CI 1.62 to 1.70 in England) and young maternal age.
Conclusions Children attending ED in England were much more likely to be admitted than those in Ontario. The tendency towards more frequent, shorter admissions in England could be due to more pressure to admit within waiting time targets, or less availability of paediatric expertise in ED. Further evaluations should consider where best to focus resources, including in-hospital, primary care and paediatric care in the community.
Full text is available here